Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 736-740 (August 2010)


View previous. 11 of 16 View next.

Plant sterol and stanol substrate specificity of pancreatic cholesterol esterase

Andrew W. Browna, Jiliang Hangb, Patrick H. Dussaultb, Timothy P. CarraCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 24 December 2008; received in revised form 17 March 2009; accepted 21 April 2009. published online 17 July 2009.

Abstract 

Consumption of plant sterols or stanols (collectively referred to as phytosterols) and their esters results in decreased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, which is associated with decreased atherosclerotic risk. The mechanisms by which phytosterols impart their effects, however, are incompletely characterized. The objective of the present study is to determine if pancreatic cholesterol esterase (PCE; EC 3.1.1.13), the enzyme primarily responsible for cholesterol ester hydrolysis in the digestive tract, is capable of hydrolyzing various phytosterol esters and to compare the rates of sterol ester hydrolysis in vitro. We found that PCE hydrolyzes palmitate, oleate and stearate esters of cholesterol, stigmasterol, stigmastanol and sitosterol. Furthermore, we found that the rate of hydrolysis was dependent on both the sterol and the fatty acid moieties in the following order of rates of hydrolysis: cholesterol>(sitosterol=stigmastanol)>stigmasterol; oleate>(palmitate=stearate). The addition of free phytosterols to the system did not change hydrolytic activity of PCE, while addition of palmitate, oleate or stearate increased activity. Thus, PCE may play an important but discriminatory role in vivo in the liberation of free phytosterols to compete with cholesterol for micellar solubilization and absorption.

a Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0806, USA

b Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0304, NE, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 402 472 7940; fax: +1 402 472 1587.

 Grants, sponsors and funding sources: A.W.B. and J.H. were supported by USDA-NRI competitive grant no. 2007-35200-18298. The research was also supported in part by the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division with funds provided through the Hatch Act. Portions of this work were conducted in facilities remodeled with support from NIH (RR016544-01). NMR spectra were acquired, in part, on spectrometers purchased with NSF support (MRI 0079750 and CHE 0091975).

PII: S0955-2863(09)00101-6

doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.04.008


View previous. 11 of 16 View next.

Advertisement