The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
Volume 18, Issue 12 , Pages 813-819, December 2007

Moderate zinc deficiency negatively affects biomechanical properties of rat tibiae independently of body composition

  • Angus G. Scrimgeour

      Affiliations

    • Military Nutrition Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760-5007, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 508 233 5155; fax: +1 508 233 4869.
  • ,
  • Chad H. Stahl

      Affiliations

    • Animal Science Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3150, USA
  • ,
  • James P. McClung

      Affiliations

    • Military Nutrition Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760-5007, USA
  • ,
  • Louis J. Marchitelli

      Affiliations

    • Military Nutrition Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760-5007, USA
  • ,
  • Andrew J. Young, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Military Nutrition Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760-5007, USA

Received 6 July 2006; received in revised form 20 November 2006; accepted 28 December 2006. published online 10 May 2007.

Abstract 

To guide development of novel nutritional strategies aimed at reducing the incidence of stress fractures, we observed the effects of manipulating dietary zinc (Zn) content on bone integrity in Sprague–Dawley rats fed either a severely Zn-deficient (ZnD; 1 ppm), a moderately Zn-deficient (MZnD; 5 ppm) or a Zn-adequate (ZnAD; 30 ppm) diet for 6 weeks. At the completion of the diet period, body composition, bone mineral content (BMC), bone area (BA) and bone mineral density (BMD) were determined in vivo by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Following euthanasia, long bones were collected for determination of Zn content and biomechanical strength testing. Despite significant positive correlations between dietary Zn and both body weight (BW) and bone Zn content for the entire cohort (r=.77 and r=.83, respectively), rats fed MZnD or ZnAD diets did not differ in feed intakes, body composition, BMC, BA, BMD or BW. Tibial bones, but not femur bones, appear to be more responsive to dietary Zn manipulation, as all bone biomechanical strength indices in the ZnAD-fed rats were significantly greater than in rats fed the ZnD diets. Rats fed either MZnD or ZnAD diets had stronger tibiae (129% increase in maximum load and stress at maximum load, P<.01) compared with those fed ZnD diets. The load at breakage for the tibial bones of rats fed MZnD diets was not different from the ZnD rats, but lower (P<.05) than that of the ZnAD rats. These results suggest that since feed intakes, body composition, BMC, BA, BMD and BW were not significantly different between the MZnD- and ZnAD-fed animals, the reduced bone integrity observed in the MZnD-fed rats resulted from dietary Zn inadequacy, and not as a result of the reduced growth that is typically associated with Zn deficiency.

Abbreviations: BA, bone area, BMC, bone mineral content, BMD, bone mineral density, BW, body weight, DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, FM, fat mass, LBM, lean body mass, Zn, zinc

Keywords: Zinc, DXA, Bone mineral density, Rat

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by the U.S. Army MRMC. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Army or the Department of Defense.

PII: S0955-2863(07)00044-7

doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2006.12.018

The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
Volume 18, Issue 12 , Pages 813-819, December 2007